Best of the Best Diabetes Diet - DASH Diet Compared and Greatest Loser
style="display:block; text-align:center;"
data-ad-format="fluid"
data-ad-layout="in-article"
data-ad-client="ca-pub-9623405102354877"
data-ad-slot="5622929528">
A comparison of their nutritional values shows that although the Biggest Loser diet supplies 1,489 calories as against the recommended daily intake of between 1600 and 2000 (depending on age) for women and between 2000 to 2400 calories (also depending on age), the DASH diet supplies on its 1500 calories and 2300 calories diet 2037 and 2062 mg respectively.
In a list of 35 popular diets to get a research performed by US News and World Report magazine the expert opinion of assembled experts gave us the verdict of The Biggest Loser diet and the DASH diet as being the best diet for diabetics, at both assisting individuals to protect against the disease or for people who already have it, reversing it. However, is there really a best of the best? Amongst these two champions, is there a winner? I opted to do a step in order to find out.
An assessment of which diets calorie provision puts it closest to the benchmark allotted to each age grade sets the DASH diet before the Loser diet. As such, the first point goes into the DASH diet. For the Loser diet whilst it provides about 25 percent of the days calories, the DASH diets 27 percent and 26 for 2300 mg versions and its 1500 mg. This is against the daily level of between 20 to 35 percent on these scores.
I compared two sample menus used by the board assembled by and utilized by the US News specialists. Whereas the Biggest Loser diet provided for Breakfast, snack, Lunch, Snack and dinner, the DASH diet only supplied for breakfast, lunch and dinner.
Saturated fat, both diets have down to about 5 percent, even though the DASH diets 2300 mg advantages further with an extra percent (at 6 percent). These both fall within the boundaries of the under 10 percent recommendation. On fats I score them evenly.
style="display:block; text-align:center;"
data-ad-format="fluid"
data-ad-layout="in-article"
data-ad-client="ca-pub-9623405102354877"
data-ad-slot="5622929528">
0 comments